By J J Day
Nearly, half a million flora records have now been entered into an electronic database. These break down, approximately, as half for each period : 1965-1986 and 1987-2002. Interrogation of the data can now be rapid and change can be analysed with greater versatility.
In Worcestershire, this species is a good indicator of certain unimproved grassland communities principally the NVC type MG5c (Rodwell, 1994). This is a threatened and declining habitat throughout lowland Britain. Worcestershire supports a significant proportion of the national resource.
Division of the records into date classes allows a rapid assessment of habitat loss. This is indicative of a loss of approximately 18% in MG5c grassland between 1970 and 2001. Figure 1 indicates monad distribution: records are divided into two date classes - 1970 -1986 and 1987-2002.
Figure 1 Alchemilla filicaulis subsp.vestita 1970 - 2001
= Records
1970- 1986 only
= Records
1987 - 2002
The first record, for Worcestershire was in 1977 by a disused brine pit at Stoke Works. It has not been re-found at that site. The population has not contributed to the current expansion.
The pattern of colonisation :-
In 1989, it appeared on the M50 motorway, in the extreme southwest of the county. | |
By the mid-1990s it had colonised most of the motorway and dual carriageway network. The order of colonisation being M5, A449(T), A456, A448, A38. | |
By the late-1990s it had spread to other A-roads and some B-roads. | |
There is now a spread into urban areas. |
The rate of colonisation, for a vascular plant, in the period 1989 - 2002 is dramatic. There are currently records from 346 monads. If the remote populations are linked along the roads, then the known spread of colonisation extends to 427 km. This gives a rate of colonisation of 30.5 km./year. or 3.5 m/hour., over this period. Clearly in a favourable habitat, Cochlearia danica is a mobile species, highly efficient at locating suitable micro-niches over fairly long distances.
The pattern of colonisation, on individual roads, is of interest. It can be viewed in detail by examining records on a year by year basis. A number of phases are apparent :-
The individual pattern of colonisation for each road is unique.
Seed dispersal appears to be, mainly, on currents of turbulence. Both wind and water are utilised as dispersal agents. Long distance dispersal is probably wind borne - stages 1 and 2. The slower rate of these phases is due to the degree of chance. The rapid phase 3 may be largely water borne as colonies coalesce over micro- and macro-catchments.
The micro-niche requirements can be
determined by the pattern within initial colonisations. This is
most apparent in the earliest phases of colonisation before seed
saturation is reached.
Soils are important. In the colonisation of the A-road network
there is a bias towards light well drained soils, such as the
Triassic sandstone area and the gravels of river terrace deposits.
Clay and calcareous soils are generally avoided, even
occasionally, on dual carriageways. On less favoured soils,
colonisation of the road network may stall after initial
colonisation, or be very slow, such as the A44 east of Worcester.
Other soil characteristics :-
Fine silts and stony ground feature as favoured substrates. | |
A tendency for water accumulation, puddling, in wet weather. | |
Bare ground - including vehicle tracks. | |
High water stress in summer - this reduces competition from perennials and therefore helps maintain open areas, suitable for germination. |
Slope is important. Initial colonies on new roads, tend to occur on down-slopes or in valleys. This is, presumably, due to down-wash phenomenon - of seed, salt and fine silts. A good place to look for new colonies on roads is around bridges over watercourses. Drip from motorway bridges accounts for some colonies, such as on the canal at Offerton and the B4090 at Hadzor. Changes in carriageway direction, such as bends and roundabouts, are frequent sites for initial colonisation. Turbulence, bare ground, silt and seed accumulation are causal factors.
The micro-topography of the profile, across a carriageway, is very important. Bare ground is often a feature. Flat open areas, particularly if puddling is likely, alongside carriageways facilitate rapid colonisation. Loose hard shoulders, such as on A449(T) Worcester northern link, provide prime sites. Central reservations with bare areas are similarly favoured. The 15cm. zone back from kerb tops can be important. In rural, locations farm gateways with bare, puddled, areas by main roads, are preferential niches.
The distribution map can be used, as a quick indicator, of the zone of greatest urban pressure even though colonisation of strictly urban roads and streets is only beginning to show. In urban settings niches of soil are a scarce resource amid a frequently inhospitable environment. The seed bank must have reached high levels to facilitate urban spread.
Roads have a significant local impact, on the physical and chemical properties of soils. Compounds other than salt may also play a role. Concentrations of heavy metal ions may be important, for instance in reducing competition. Current management is creating a novel suite of soils. The vegetation of the British Isles has responded.
Knowledge of the biology of mobility may prove crucial for the retention of biodiversity. Particularly in a landscape with an increasingly fragmented network of semi-natural habitats. Clearly, habitat corridors can be important, in aiding rapid colonisation.
The three figures show the distribution plotted as monads at the end of 1989, the end of 1995, and up to April 2002.
Cochlearia danica all records up to end of 1989
Cochlearia danica all records up to end of 1995
Cochlearia danica all records up to April 2002
This pool was described by Fincher (1966) as one of the finest natural sights in the district. In the mid-1980s it was made available for angling. It is relatively small, about 0.6 ha. It is of county significance for wildlife. What has been the impact of the change in management on its natural history interest? Can the old records illuminate change?
The database holds records from six survey dates with varying degrees of completeness. In order to utilise all the records they were plotted on a matrix against time. Points were joined to give a minimum date range for each species. This allows all records, including those for single species, to be used.
A total of 60 wetland plant species have been found on the site since 1966. Twenty three, approximately 40% of the flora, are lost. This is inclusive of the natural turnover rate, which in aquatic/wetland communities can be high. It is a function of micro-habitat availability, niche number and loading. The totals for previous dates give a better comparison for assessing change. A figure, for total carrying capacity in any given year, is found, by counting down a column. This, partially, offsets the problem of site recording. No single visit will record all taxa present.
There has been a decline from a mean of 40 species for three surveys in the mid-1980s, to 34 species in 2000. This indicates a decline in wetland species diversity of 15%.
Utilising, the county rarity score as outlined in Day J.J. (2001):-
mean score for the three surveys in the 1980s is 1.85 | |
score for 2000 is 1.70 |
Applying, a similiar method from a national system, National Pond Survey (1993), the Species Rarity Index is :-
mean score for the three surveys in the 1980s is 1.23 | |
score for 2000 is 1.21 |
The national ranking has fallen from very high quality in the 1980s to a high quality pond in 2000.
The species richness has declined
(* = non-native)
Year | 65 70 80 90 00 |
Aquatic- | |
Chara sp. | X |
Potamogeton pectinatus | --------------------------------------------------- |
Ceratophyllum demersum | ----- |
*Elodea canadensis | --------------------------------------- |
*Elodea nuttallii | ---------------------------- |
Nuphar lutea | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
*Nymphoides peltata | --------------------------------------- |
Lemna minor | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Persicaria amphibia | ------------------------- |
Callitriche sp. | X |
Open swamp / Water margin | |
Veronica beccabunga | X |
Apium nodiflorum | ------------------------- |
Alisma plantago-aquatica | X |
Mentha aquatica | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Myosotis scorpioides | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Rorippa amphibia | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum | ---------------------------- |
Lycopus europaeus | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Carex otrubae | ----------------------------------- |
Carex pseudocyperus | X |
Inudation | |
Glyceria fluitans | --------------------------------------------------- |
Persicaria hydropiper | X |
Bidens cernua | X |
Ranunculus sceleratus | ----------------------- |
Agrostis stolonifera | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Alopecurus geniculatus | X |
Juncus bufonius | X |
Reedswamp | |
Carex acutiformis | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Carex riparia | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Iris pseudocorus | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Solanum dulcamara | ---------------------------------------------------- |
Sparganium erectum | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Typha latifolia | X |
Backmarsh / Fen | |
Scutellaria galericulata | X |
Galium palustre subsp. palustre | X |
Juncus effusus | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Juncus inflexus | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Lotus pendunculatus | X |
Achillea ptarmica | X |
Cirsium palustre | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Deschampsia cespitosa | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Epilobium hirsutum | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Epilobium parviflorum | X |
Eupatorium cannabinum | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Filipendula ulmaria | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Angelica sylvestris | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Myosoton aquaticum | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Scrophularia auriculata | ----------------------------------------------------- |
*Impatiens glandulifera | |
Conium maculatum | X |
Trees / Shrubs | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Alnus glutinosa | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Salix cinerea subsp.oleifolia | ----------------------------------------------------- |
Salix alba | X |
Salix caprea | X |
Salix fragilis | ----------------------------------------------------- |
*Salix x sepulcralis | X |
Populus nigra subsp. betulifolia | ----------------------------------------------------- |
By arranging the flora records into broad phytosociological groupings (see table), it is possible to pinpoint some of the impacts and their causes.
The losses and change are not evenly distributed, across all
habitats/communities.
There has been little change overall in :-
species composition amongst the principle trees | |
in reedswamp composition. |
Robust perennials are at least risk.
The aquatic community has altered significantly.
The assemblage in 1986 was a Lake Type 9 (Palmer et al 1992). This is equivalent to an unimproved, eutrophic community. Such sites are rare and declining in England. | |
The assemblage in 2000 is a Lake Type 10 (Palmer 1992). This is the equivalent of a eutrophic weed assemblage. They are common throughout much of England. |
Biodiversity has risen but alien species are now dominant.
The quality has declined.
The mean Ellenberg score (Hill, 1999), for nitrogen requirement, has increased from 6.2 in the mid 1980s to 6.4 in 2000. The mean of the lost species is 6. This shift is indicative of an increase in eutrophication, particularily, in phosphate levels. This is a characteristic of angled sites compounded here by the small size of the pond. The likely origins of eutrophication, associated with the fishing include
ground baiting | |
disturbance of bottom sediment through clearance | |
disturbance of bottom sediment by introduced carp | |
disturbance of bottom sediment by fishing tackle | |
use of aquatic herbicides | |
faunal load - repeated fish introductions |
Alien species are another characteristic problem associated with angling
accidental introduction, of the alien Elodea pondweeds, through agencies such as infected tackle or fish introductions | |
deliberate introduction - fringed water-lily, Nymphoides peltata |
There is a cycle of inappropriate management. The ecological
dynamics of the pond, have not been understood. Rather than
working with the capabilities of the resource, the anglers have
relentlessly pursued their own vision.
It serves as an example.
This was a yellow water lily pond. These are rare in
Worcestershire. Anglers do not like fishing around lily beds. It
gives the fish an advantage. They attempted to destroy the water-lilies.
Herbicides and clearance were used. The chemistry of the water
was altered. Fringed water-lily was introduced. This filled the
floating species niche. This became rampant. Herbicides were used.
This further disrupted the ecology.
Yellow water lilies are protected by a powerful rhizome, these
can grow to significant dimensions, in effect they are
subterranean, underwater trunks. They are still present, although
much reduced. Meanwhile, the angler's cycle of management
continues.
Open swamp species and water margin vegetation -
there has been a highly significant loss. These communities have
been severely disrupted or entirely destroyed.
The decline of open swamp species is 71% and of inundation
grassland species 60%.
These species tend to be easily uprooted annuals or short lived perennials. The loss due, principally, to trampling of edges, disturbance and intentional clearance.
Backmarsh, Fen, Damp Grassland community
The loss is significant, with a decline of 35%, mainly amongst
damp grassland species.
These communities are scarce in Worcestershire.
The cause of loss is concentrated people pressure, such as
trampling, disturbance, and direct clearance. There is even an
annual burn, by a well meaning ornithologist/angler. The problem
is exasperated, by the density of fishing pegs and through access
onto an island. The later holds an alder fen woodland type W5b (Rodwell,
1991). This is a rare type in the county.
The more robust species have survived best. Small perennials are
at greatest risk
The temporal distributions of a series of site based records have enabled the extent and causes of ecological change to be identified. | |
There has been a marked decline in ecological quality, due to people pressure. | |
There has been too much angling, over too much of the site and for too long. | |
The declines are liable to continue if current management remains the same. |
DAY J.J. 2001 Checklist of the Worcestershire Flora. Worcestershire Wildlife Trust . | |
FINCHER F. 1966. Ecological Survey. Redditch Development Corporation | |
HILL M.O.et al. 1999. Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants. | |
NATIONAL POND SURVEY. 1993 Methods Booklet. Pond Action. | |
PALMER M., BELL S.L., BUTTERFIELD I. 1992. A botanical Classification of standing waters in Britain. Aquatic Conservation Vol.2, pages 125-143. | |
RODWELL J.S. (ed) 1991. British Plant Communities Vol.1 Woodlands and Scrub, CUP | |
RODWELL J.S. (ed) 1994. British Plant Communities Vol.3 Grasslands. CUP |
WBRC Home | Worcs Record Listing by Issue | Worcs Record Listing by Subject |