J J Day
This article based on a paper presented at the WBRC Annual Meeting March 2003.
Botanical records are being extracted from the literature and entered onto the RECORDER database in chronological order. The period 1600 - 1875 is largely, complete. This article presents some facts and figures derived from these historical records.
Botanical Literature
Several bibliographical indexes are available for Worcestershire.
Principal Indexes / Bibliographies on Worcestershire Botany
William Mathews, History of the County Botany of Worcester, Midland Naturalist, 1887-1893. This is not a strict bibliography but reviews literature and selects records. These include all first county records and most first district records.
John Humphreys, Bibliography of Worcestershire. Part III. Works
Relating To The Botany of Worcestershire, Worcestershire Historical Society,
1907
Simpson, N.D., Index of the Bibliography of the British Flora, 1960
post-1960 Botanical Society of British Isles (BSBI) Abstracts
These cover the majority of known and available sources but are not exhaustive. Novel sources and overlooked references continue to be unearthed. For instance, a MS copy of Edwin Lees' hand written journal from the 1820s and Richard Towndrow's MS List of Malvern Plants c1903, were recently discovered, both in Worcester Library.
Worcestershire's Earliest Botanical References
The record starts with a reference to Worcestershire in Leland's Itinery of
1549. However the site, for Juniper, is in Gloucestershire, at Tetbury Castle,
in Twyning. The first genuine Worcestershire records are How's from 1650. The
early publications contains some excellent records, including several firsts for
Britain, but there are very few in number before 1750.
Worcestershire's Earliest Botanical References 1600 - 1750
* = First British Record
1650 | Consolida ajacis | Pershore Parish | How | W. |
1650 | Ranunculus ficaria | Worcestershire | How | W. [reference is to a large flowered specimen - hints at ssp. ficariiformis] |
1666 | Bellis perennis | Worcestershire | Morgan | Mr |
1666 | Gentianella amarella | Church Lench | Merrett | C. |
1666 | Lactuca saligna | Church Lench | Merrett | C. |
1666 | Rosa pimpinellifolia | Church Lench | Merrett | C. |
1666 | Rosa pimpinellifolia | Worcester | Brown | Mr |
1666 | Rosa rubiginosa agg. | Worcestershire | Brown | Mr |
*1670 | Cynoglossum germanicum | Worcester | Pitt | Mr E |
*1677 | Sorbus domestica | Wyre Forest | Pitt | Mr E. |
1695 | Colchicum autumnale | Worcestershire | Ray | J. |
1695 | Triticum aestivum | Worcestershire | Ray | J. |
1724 | Colchicum autumnale | Mathon Parish | Manningham | Mr |
*1726 | Campanula patula | Elbury Hill | Brewer | Mr |
The botanical description of Worcestershire starts to get underway towards
the end of the eighteenth century. This is heralded by the publication of a
first county list by Nash in 1781 and the second edition of Withering's Arrangement
of British Plants, edited by Stokes. Doctors of Medicine figure prominently
in the early work. Withering himself was a doctor based in Birmingham and his
editor, Johnathan Stokes, a Kidderminster doctor. Nash produced a supplement in
1799. It appears the compiler was Dr.J.Seward of Great Comberton and later of
Sapey, a doctor at Worcester Infirmary. He added Hypericum maculatum to
the British list, from Sapey, where it still occurs.
Records of Dr.Seward in Nash published 1781, 1799
Map above shows tetrad distribution of Dr.Seward’s records:
An impression of the trends and level of botanical activity can be gleaned
from the rate of production of botanical publications. The trends in
botanical publication reflect fashions within botanical recording and also
broader sociological changes within Britain. The situation in Worcestershire
presents a microcosm for trends in British botanical recording. For an overview
see David Allen's Naturalists in Britain.
Number of Botanical Publications 1500 - 1950
1500-1950 Publications per half century
1500-1599 | 1 | [First botanic reference 1549 Leland's Itinery but record in Gloucs.] |
1600-1649 | 2 | |
1650-1699 | 6 | |
1700-1750 | 4 | |
1750-1799 | 22 | |
1800-1849 | 106 | |
1850-1899 | 255 | |
1900-1950 | 81 |
1750-1930 Publications per decade
1750-1759 | 1 | |
1760-1769 | 2 | |
1770-1779 | 5 | Nash (First County List); Withering |
1780-1789 | 6 | |
1790-1799 | 8 | |
1800-1809 | 5 | |
1810-1819 | 7 | Purton's Regional Flora of Midlands; Pitt Agriculture of Worcestershire |
1820-1829 | 17 | Lees' first publication 1828 |
1830-1839 | 31 | Scott's local flora of Stourbridge area |
1840-1849 | 46 | Lees district flora of Malvern Hills; Worcs.Nat.Club (formation); New's local flora of Evesham area |
1850-1859 | 65 | Lees district flora of Malvern Hills; Baxter's local flora of Worcester area. |
1860-1869 | 36 | Lees Flora of Worcestershire; Lees district flora of Malvern Hills; Mathews local flora of Clent area; Jorden's local flora of Bewdley / Wyre Forest |
1870-1879 | 33 | |
1880-1889 | 70 | Mathews' local flora of Clent and Lickey; Mathews History of Worcestershire Botany |
1890-1899 | 51 | Towndrow flora of Malvern district |
1900-1909 | 49 | Amphlett full county list, Amphlett & Rea Flora of Worcestershire |
1910-1919 | 17 | Humphreys Flora of East Worcestershire |
1920-1929 | 9 | Rea's Appendix to Flora of Worcestershire |
Quantity of Records generated from Literature
Novel Literature Records Cumulative Total
1400 -1699 | 16 |
1400 -1750 | 18 |
1400 -1799 | 300 |
1400 -1825 | 824 |
1400 -1850 | 4374 |
1400 -1875 | 12755 |
there are many repetitions in the literature (each major publication reviews its predecessors) | |
individual records can have up to eight separate literature references. These are counted only once. | |
the totals include site / species repetitions, when date or recorder is novel. For instance, Lepidium draba, Hoary Pennycress has 10 separate references by Lees from the roadside by Powick Bridge | |
it is estimated that throughout literature 1400-1875 there is a likely maximum of 5000 un-extracted records, the majority of these will give new date classes only |
Distribution of Records / Geographical Coverage of the County
The patterns of accumulation of records are interesting.
There is a strong correlation between home-base and density of dots. Where
the pattern is fragmented it should not be presumed there was no recording. In
moving between dots, before motorised transport, botanists covered vastly more
ground than they left records for. The tetrad maps are useful in identifying the
range of botanical activities. The clustering on the monad maps indicate well
worked areas, often around a favoured locality or home-base.
Map above shows All Records 1400-1750 (tetrads)
Map
above shows All Records 1400-1799 (tetrads)
Map above shows All Records 1400-1825 (tetrads)
Map above shows All Records 1400-1850 (tetrads)
Map above shows all Records 1400-1875 (tetrads)
Map above shows all Records 1400-1875 (monads).
The gaps in distribution highlight areas of least activity. These can be
deceptive. For instance, the Teme and Kyre Brook valleys indicate little
recording. They were undoubtedly not as thoroughly covered as elsewhere but the
records include several very rare species, Fly Orchid and Mezereum. To
hunt these down, quite a lot of fieldwork would have been necessary. Most
records come from incumbent priests. We can presume a good deal of fieldwork was
undertaken but only a trace of this remains in the botanical record. The gap
immediately around Redditch is largely filled with records from the Bagnall's Flora
of Warwickshire, 1891. The gap in the Wythall / Beoley area remains largely
unfilled until the 1970s. It would seem that it was, in part, entirely
unvisited. The major surprises are the lack of records from the triangle between
Bromsgrove, Droitwich and Kidderminster and in the east beyond Upton Snodsbury
and around Inkberrow. Were these areas worked and nothing found or were they
neglected? Interestingly, these areas have been proved some of the least diverse
during recording for Worcestershire Flora Project (WFP Newsletters).
The Early Records 1780-1830
This was a period of considerable change in the English countryside. It was
the time of agricultural "improvements" and widespread enclosures. The
botanical records allow a glimpse of the pre-improvement landscape. There is
frequent reference to lost and diminishing sites. Once entered onto the
database, the records can be viewed and grouped in a variety of ways to aid
interpretation. During the period, each new major publication, seemed to
generate a series of local correspondents :-
The Stokes / Withering partnership received records from Mr.Ballard,
a surgeon of Hanley Castle, who provided records from the pre-enclosed Malvern
Chase. His lists give a bog component to the flora. This had been lost by the
time Lees worked the district in the 1820s-1830s.
Mr.Ballard : Records Malvern Chase 1780s / 90s
Total 61 records
Acorus calamus | Sweet-flag |
Anthyllis vulneraria | Kidney Vetch |
Apium inundatum | Lesser Marshwort |
Aquilegia vulgaris | Columbine |
Blackstonia perfoliata | Yellow-wort |
Butomus umbellatus | Flowering Rush |
Carex disticha | Brown Sedge |
Carex pulicaris | Flea Sedge |
Ceratocapnos claviculata | Climbing Corydalis |
Chrysosplenium alternifolium | Alternate-leaved Golden-saxifrage |
Cirsium dissectum | Meadow Thistle |
Cirsium eriophorum | Woolly Thistle |
Colchicum autumnale | Meadow Saffron |
Dipsacus pilosus | Small Teasel |
Drosera rotundifolia | Round-leaved Sundew |
Epipactis palustris | Marsh Helleborine |
Erica tetralix | Cross-leaved Heath |
Filipendula vulgaris | Dropwort |
Helleborus viridis | Green Hellebore |
Lathyrus latifolius | Broad-leaved Everlasting-pea |
Luzula sylvatica | Great Wood-rush |
Lysimachia vulgaris | Yellow Loosestrife |
Mentha pulegium | Pennyroyal |
Minuartia hybrida | Fine-leaved Sandwort |
Misopates orontium | Weasel's-snout |
Myosurus minimus | Mousetail |
Myrrhis odorata | Sweet Cicely |
Nardus stricta | Mat-grass |
Oenanthe aquatica | Fine-leaved Water-dropwort |
Orobanche rapum-genistae | Greater Broomrape |
Paris quadrifolia | Herb Paris |
Persicaria bistorta | Common Bistort |
Petrorhagia prolifera | Proliferous Pink |
Pimpinella major | Greater Burnet-saxifrage |
Pinguicula vulgaris | Common Butterwort |
Potentilla argentea | Hoary Cinquefoil |
Ranunculus lingua | Greater Spearwort |
Ranunculus parviflorus | Small-flowered Buttercup |
Rumex hydrolapathum | Water Dock |
Rumex maritimus | Golden Dock |
Sambucus ebulus | Dwarf Elder |
Samolus valerandi | Brookweed |
Sedum rupestre | Reflexed Stonecrop |
Sedum telephium | Orpine |
Umbilicus rupestris | Navelwort |
Vaccinium myrtillus | Bilberry |
Viburnum lantana | Wayfaring-tree |
Thomas Purton was a doctor of medicine who
lived at Alcester. He produced the first full regional flora of the Midlands in
1817 (only the rarer species are localised). Purton's own records show he had
extensive knowledge of Worcestershire.
It is well known that it is only through Purton' s records that the botanical
riches and lost fen communities of Feckenham Bog are known (the site had been
destroyed when Lees visited 20-30 years later). But his records also indicate a
little known acidic heath and bog community at Astwood Bank.
Map above shows Purton's records (tetrads)
Thomas Purton : Site Lists for Hectad SP06, records published 1817-1821
Astwood Bank | Carlina vulgaris |
Astwood Bank | Linum usitatissimum |
Astwood Bank | Salix aurita |
Astwood Bank | Salix purpurea |
Astwood Bank | Veronica officinalis |
Astwood Common | Agrostis capillaris |
Astwood Common | Erica tetralix |
Astwood Common | Hydrocotyle vulgaris |
Astwood Common | Radiola linoides |
Astwood Common | Senecio sylvaticus |
Astwood Common | Trifolium micranthum |
Astwood Common | Ulex gallii |
Astwood Common | Vulpia bromoides |
Cookhill Parish | Galanthus nivalis |
Evesham Road Headless Cross | Plantago coronopus |
Feckenham Bog | Anagallis tenella |
Feckenham Bog | Baldellia ranunculoides |
Feckenham Bog | Carex distans |
Feckenham Bog | Carex pulicaris |
Feckenham Bog | Chara tomentosa |
Feckenham Bog | Cirsium dissectum |
Feckenham Bog | Cladium mariscus |
Feckenham Bog | Epilobium palustre |
Feckenham Bog | Equisetum palustre |
Feckenham Bog | Galium uliginosum |
Feckenham Bog | Hydrocotyle vulgaris |
Feckenham Bog | Lemna trisulca |
Feckenham Bog | Parnassia palustris |
Feckenham Bog | Pinguicula vulgaris |
Feckenham Bog | Schoenus nigricans |
Feckenham Bog | Triglochin palustre |
Feckenham Bog | Zannichellia palustris |
Ipsley Parish | Carpinus betulus |
River Arrow in VC38 | Campanula latifolia |
River Arrow in VC38 | Oenothera biennis |
Washford | Mycelis muralis |
Washford | Sparganium emersum |
One of his early correspondents was the Rev.W.S.Rufford of
Badsey. His records provide a wealth of detail on the species and communities in
the Vale of Evesham. The list is in many respects stunning. There would be no
inkling of this assemblage, particularily the halophytes and arable weed
spectrum, without Rufford's work. W.Cheshire visted the Badsey area in
the 1850's, in an attempt to relocate rarities, but reported little of interest
amidst an improved landscape and deeply dug drains.
Rev.W.S.Rufford : Records published 1871-1821 mainly, S.E.Worcs, especially,
Badsey and Littleton area
Total 30 records
Acorus calamus | Sweet-flag |
Asperula cynanchica | Squinancywort |
Bolboschoenus maritimus | Sea Club-rush |
Carex dioica | Dioecious Sedge |
Cerastium arvense | Field Mouse-ear |
Ceterach officinarum | Rustyback |
Chaenorhinum minus | Small Toadflax |
Chamaemelum nobile | Chamomile |
Erigeron acer | Blue Fleabane |
Festuca pratensis x Lolium perenne | |
Geranium phaeum | Dusky Crane's-bill |
Helictotrichon pratense | Meadow Oat-grass |
Koeleria macrantha | Crested Hair-grass |
Limosella aquatica | Mudwort |
Linaria vulgaris | Common Toadflax |
Lythrum hyssopifolia | Grass-poly |
Myosotis discolor | Changing Forget-me-not |
Oenanthe aquatica | Fine-leaved Water-dropwort |
Ophrys apifera | Bee Orchid |
Pseudofumaria lutea | Yellow Corydalis |
Pyrola minor | Common Wintergreen |
Rorippa sylvestris | Creeping Yellow-cress |
Sagina nodosa | Knotted Pearlwort |
Sedum dasyphyllum | Thick-leaved Stonecrop |
Senecio viscosus | Sticky Groundsel |
Spergularia marina | Lesser Sea-spurrey |
Verbascum virgatum | Twiggy Mullein |
Vicia sylvatica | Wood Vetch |
Purton's Midland Flora was a success. It generated so many new records that
an Appendix was issued in 1821. Two of the contributors of Worcestershire
records were a Mrs.Gardener and a Mr.Hickman, who
both produced records from the Abberley area. Mr.Hickman was a Ludlow man but
little is currently, known of Mrs.Gardener. Botany was by and large a male
preserve in the nineteenth century (the Naturalists' Clubs were generally all
male affairs). So Mrs.Gardener is not only the first woman to make a
contribution to the botanical record, but one of less than half a dozen female
names to appear in the whole of the nineteenth century. Her 19 records indicate
a good botanical eye, a serious knowledge of plants and tell of considerable
time spent in the field. It can be presumed that Purton vouched their records,
in most cases with specimens. It is highly probable their lists were much longer
and that Purton cherry-picked the records.
Mr.Hickman : Records published 1821 Stourport / Abberley area
Total 17 records
Aquilegia vulgaris | Columbine |
Brassica napus | Rape |
Campanula latifolia | Giant Bellflower |
Campanula patula | Spreading Bellflower |
Cardamine amara | Large Bitter-cress |
Convallaria majalis | Lily of the Valley |
Corydalis solida | Bird-in-a-bush |
Galanthus nivalis | Snowdrop |
Geum rivale | Water Avens |
Helleborus foetidus | Stinking Hellebore |
Lathyrus aphaca | Yellow Vetchling |
Menyanthes trifoliata | Bogbean |
Scutellaria minor | Lesser Skullcap |
Stellaria palustris | Marsh Stitchwort |
Thlaspi arvense | Field Penny-cress |
Mrs.Gardener : Records published 1821 Shrawley / Abberley area
Total 19 records
Butomus umbellatus | Flowering Rush |
Campanula latifolia | Giant Bellflower |
Campanula patula | Spreading Bellflower |
Cardamine amara | Large Bitter-cress |
Cardamine impatiens | Narrow-leaved Bitter-cress |
Cephalanthera longifolia | Narrow-leaved Helleborine |
Dianthus deltoides | Maiden Pink |
Gentianella amarella | Autumn Gentian |
Helleborus foetidus | Stinking Hellebore |
Helleborus viridis | Green Hellebore |
Lathraea squamaria | Toothwort |
Lathyrus nissolia | Grass Vetchling |
Lysimachia vulgaris | Yellow Loosestrife |
Misopates orontium | Weasel's-snout |
Monotropa hypopitys | Yellow Bird's-nest |
Ophrys apifera | Bee Orchid |
Orchis ustulata | Burnt Orchid |
Potentilla palustris | Marsh Cinquefoil |
Silene gallica | Small-flowered Catchfly |
Habitat Lists
The first community list for Worcestershire was a surprise find. Tucked away
in Pitt's General Survey of the Agriculture of Worcestershire, 1813, is a
plant list (mainly grasses), by W.Marshall, agricultural advisor,
concerning the flood plain meadows of the Severn and Avon vales, from 1805. This
contains first county records and has been overlooked by previous researchers.
If Lees specific references from this habitat are added, a very creditable
community description is provided.
Ham Meadows of the Severn and Avon Valleys
William Marshall, 1805, in W.Pitt's General Survey of the Agriculture of
Worcestershire :-
Agrostis capillaris
Agrostis stolonifera
Alopecurus geniculatus
Alopecurus pratensis
Anthoxanthum odoratum
Briza media
Bromus hordeaceus
Carex sp.
Cynosurus cristatus
Dactylis glomerata
Festuca arundinacea
Glyceria fluitans
Holcus lanatus
Hordeum secalinum
Lathyrus pratensis
Lolium perenne
Lotus corniculatus
Phleum pratense sens.lat
Poa sp.
Ranunculus repens
Sanguisorba officinalis
Trifolium dubium
Trifolium pratense
Trifolium repens
Edwin Lees 1867 Botany of Worcestershire :-
Cardamine pratensis
Colchicum autumnale
Oenanthe pimpinelloides
Oenanthe silaifolia
Phleum pratense sens.str.
Ranunculus acris
Taraxacum sp.
Other Avenues of Exploration
Sources beyond the botanical literature
These remain to be extracted in detail. They include :-
Primary sources - in Herbaria
Nineteenth century botany was based on specimens - originally there must have
existed several hundred thousand herbaria specimens for Worcestershire. Most of
this is now lost but the herbaria of the most prominent Worcestershire botanists
are often still extant, although scattered through the nation's museums.
Worcester Museum still houses an exceptionally important but not easily
utilisable collection . It is likely that the surviving herbarium element will
surpass the literature records by five or even ten times. This source is as yet
largely untapped. It may be impractical to incorporate until national and local
collections are fully catalogued and made available through databases. This
source produces a wealth of novel, often site-based records, wherever a new
collection is explored.
Horticultural Sources
Archeological Sources, this is in part firm and datable, specimen-based
evidence
Other Scientific Disciplines, e.g. quaternary studies
Manuscripts
letters | |
botanists own books |
Paintings and drawings - landscapes, plants (Miss Moseley, the second woman to contribute records in Worcestershire, produced paintings of British plants, which are now housed in the British Museum)
Historical Records from other written sources.
These have generally, been poorly exploited by botanists yet they offer a
potentially rich vein of records. For certain types of information this may be
the best or indeed only source. This is the case with some species and for those
who are interested in landscape ecology. Care is necessary with regard to
taxonomy but this should not be viewed as an impediment, it is surmountable.
There has been no systematic attempt to extract this data yet. A few examples
are given.
Roman
The written record, apparently, begins for Worcestershire with Roman Sources.
For instance, the River Severn is referred to by Tacitus c115 AD.
Anglo-Saxon
The natural history literature begins in earnest with the Anglo-Saxons. For
Worcestershire, the primary colonisation appears to have been around 570-590.
The two principal sources, for local detail come from Anglo-Saxon Charters and
place-name evidence.
The Anglo-Saxon Charters are in effect land deeds. Their value to the natural
historian lies in their detailed description of the bounds of land. These are
precisely located and hold a wealth of biological detail.
Areas of interest to the natural historian include details on :
species | |
habitats / communities | |
land use / management | |
change |
Worcestershire has many charters. This is, primarily, due to the careful
stewardship of the Bishopric exercised by St.Wulstan, the last Anglo-Saxon
Bishop in England, in the eleventh century. This wealth of material has
attracted Anglo-Saxon scholars throughout the modern historical period.
Worcestershire is fortunate as most Charters have been solved and have a modern
translation (see for instance Finberg, Sawyer, Hooke, Jones). The work of Della
Hooke is highly recommended.
To illustrate the detail, information is presented from a single parish,
Wichenford.
Wichenford : Species Data from the Anglo-Saxon Charters (extracted from Hooke,
D. 1990)
Flora
The numeric references are the suggested date of the original charters. Monad
locations are given, although six-figure grid references could be given in many
cases.
Sedge - Carex sp. 757; 786; SO7756
Thorn - Crataegus sp. 757; 786; SO7556
{Ship Oak - Quercus sp.{notable veteran tree} 757; SO7960
{Rough Barked Oak - Quercus sp. {probably the Ship Oak of 757}816;
SO7960
Great Aspen - Populus tremula {notable veteran tree}757; SO7960
Woad Land - Isatis tinctoria {Landuse; Great Aspen gone, boundary
marked by cultivated field of woad} 816; SO7960; [Change 757-816]
Reed - likely Phalaris arundinacea (possible Phragmites
australis) 757; SO7960
{Five Oaks - Quercus sp. {notable grove of veteran trees}757; 969
[Stability]; SO7862
{the bent-down oak - Quercus sp. {notable veteran tree at Five
Oaks}1042; SO7862 [Change 969 -1042]
Three Oaks - Quercus sp. {notable group, likely veteran trees}816;
SO7857
Bealda's Ash-tree - Fraxinus excelsior{notable, likely, veteran
tree}816; SO8058
Fern pasture - Pteridium aquilinum {landuse - common - likely wood
pasture} 855; SO7961
Fern hedge - Pteridium aquilinum 969; SO7961
Fauna
hart bourne = Stag - Red Deer Brook 962
hawk ridge ?Buteo / Accipiter 962
king's swine 855
baerbroc = Baer Brook [Feeding ground for swine in woodland] =
Ockeridge 962
Cat's Piece = Wild Cat Wood 816
Foxbatch = Fox Brook 786
Laughern = poss. Celtic name for Fox 757
wolf-pit = Canis lupus 786 [Pit for capture and slaughter of wolves]
The following notes are taken from the Anglo-Saxon Charters; these extend
over a c300 year period. They relate to a 1.5km. length close-by the bounds of
Ockeridge Wood and illustrate the wealth of detail available.
851 to sihtferd [tributary of Grimley Brook now Grimley Brook]
962 to (the) sihtford [tributary of Grimley Brook now Grimley Brook]
969 to (the) sihtford [tributary of Grimley Brook now Grimley Brook]
1017 to (the) sihtfyrp [tributary of Grimley Brook now Grimley Brook]
1042 to (the) sihtfyrd [tributary of Grimley Brook now Grimley Brook]
962 to (the) baerbroc {name of tributary broc = brook, baer may = baer pature
esp. in woodland, a feeding ground for swine}
851 and thence from the old stud-fold by (the) Bentley people's boundary {ley
ending denotes cleared woodland}
855 right to exclusion of king's pigs
969 from (the) sihtford to (the) fern hedge
962 to the old dyke
1017 to the old ?linear clearing
1042 to the old ?linear clearing
757 to the way which is called five oaks
969 from (the) fern hedge to (the) Yard Way
851 to King's Old Enclosure - so thus along the king's old enclosure
northwards
851 to the old stud-fold {?within the King's enclosure}
757 straight on to the same five oaks
969 from (the) Yard Way to (the) five oak trees
851 to King's Old Enclosure - so thus along the king's old enclosure
northwards
851 by the boundary of the people of Moseley over Sihtferd {Grimley Brook}
962 along dyke to hart bourne {hiort = hart ie deer brook} - deer in
landscape
962 along below hart bourne to hawk ridge {= Ockeridge}
1042 along the ?linear clearing to the bent-down oak
1042 from the bent-down oak again to the old ?linear clearing
1042 along the ?linear clearing to (the) three boundaries
757 to the three boundaries
969 from (the) five oak trees to (the) three boundaries
1017 along the ?linear clearing to (the) three boundaries
975 From (the) three boundaries due west to the dyke
1017 from the three boundaries to the old dyke
757 from that place by a straight westerly way to that dyke
1042 from (the) three boundaries to the doferic [Shrawley Brook]
[1086 DB Hay -enclosure for capturing wild deer]
Worcestershire Anglo-Saxon Charters other Botanical References
Principal reference. Hooke, D. 1990 Worcestershire Anglo-Saxon Charter
Bounds
rush Juncus sp.
apple Malus sp.
willow Salix ?fragilis / alba
withy Salix ?viminalis / purpurea / cinerea / caprea
alder Alnus glutinosa
barley Hordeum sp.
birch Betula sp.
broom Cytisus scoparius
water-cress Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum agg.
yew Taxus baccata
hazel Corylus avellena
heather Calluna / Erica
heathy Vaccinium / Calluna / Erica
coarse grass ?Deschampsia cespitosa
nut-tree ?Juglans regia
holly Ilex aquilifolium
wheat Triticum sp.
hop Humulus lupulus
ivy Hedera helix
flax Linum usitatissimum
spindle Euonymus europaeus
maple Acer campestre
moss / bog Sphagnum sp.
plum Prunus sp.
pease Vicia sp [Pisum sp.]
rye Secale cerale
thistle Cirsium sp.
service Sorbus torminalis [sole English refn. Stoke Prior (Rackham,O.)]
Place name evidence
Refn. ; Mawer, A. & Stenton, F.M. Place Names of Worestershire,1927
Other species occur solely in place names
bent Agrostis capillaris (Bentley in Holt)
lime Tilia sp. (locally frequent e.g. Lineholt, Lincomb)
Medieval Sources - Doomsday Book
The Doomsday Book 1086 provides a wealth of detail on land use, population
and the rural economy. It is a very rich source for landscape historians but is
poor in species information. Faunal references are very scarce. Fisheries and
eels get several mentions. There is reference to a Hay - an enclosure for
catching Wild (Red) Deer at Bentley, Holt. Floral references are even rarer.
There is a sole enigmatic entry, considered unique, within the whole of the
Doomsday Survey (VCH) - "at Lawern there are 12 oaks".
[This grouping of twelve, 11th.C, oaks are 4km. from the group of three,
9th.C oaks and 7km. from the group of five, 8th-10th.C oaks (see above). A
pattern begins to emerge. The Anglo-Saxons called this district, in 816,
Weogorena-leage, the wood pasture lands of the Vigorna. The Vigorna were the
tribe that gave their name to the county of Worcestershire.]
Other Information available within Historical Record
Veteran Trees
The botanical literature is reasonable. Edwin Lees took a keen interest in
veteran trees as individual specimens. He left a record of 150-200, many
measured. County topographies, histories and folk-lore mention specimen and
venerated trees. These are added to the database as they come to light e.g.
Prince Robins Tree, a hawthorn, in Powick Parish and still extant in the
nineteenth century, under which Prince Rupert was said to have stood to survey
the enemy's disposition, before he attacked at the first Battle of Worcester, in
1642.
The Anglo-Saxon charters are also a rich source (yet to be extracted).
A total of 226 veteran and specimen trees from the period 1600-1899 have been
entered:-
Map above shows location of records of veteran trees (monads)
Species Information
Pear, Pyrus communis s.l.
The pear, arguably, encapsulates the local distinctiveness of Worcestershire
to a greater degree than any other species. Yet the botanical literature deals
poorly with the subject. To capture its influence upon and presence within the
county, it is necessary to look outside of the botanical literature.
Old pear trees are a distinctive and regenerating element, within Worcestershire hedgerows. There is the possibility of a locally native Pyrus. However, millennia of selection, tending and planting, will have obscured the original situation. Pear certainly behaves as a native on the county's gravel soils. It regenerates quite freely and is fully able to compete with native species.
The pear was established by the Anglo-Saxon period. This indicates a, likely, stocked landscape in the Romano-British period. Bronze Age exploitation of the pear in Worcestershire is quite likely.
Pears - pirige, pyrige are mentioned as boundary marks in the Anglo-Saxon charters. It's early importance to the county can be gleaned from its adoption by the Anglo-Saxon bishops of Worcester as a symbol for their standard. The medieval Florence of Worcester relates of St.Wulstans pear emblazoned banner. By the seventeenth century there is the testimony of Nathaniel Wharton. He was a Londoner, and a serving NCO in Essex's Army (Parliament). He wrote a letter home, in September 1642 from Worcestershire. The most striking feature of the landscape was :- "every hedge and highway beset with fruit especially pears"
Pitt in his General Survey of the Agriculture of Worcestershire, 1813,
highlights the importance of fruit growing in Worcestershire. Its relative value
to the agricultural economy can be gauged from the space devoted to it. He gives
38 pages to Gardens and Orchards, this is second in length only to Arable (77
pages) and ahead of Livestock (37 pages) and Grasslands (9 pages).
"the pear loves sloping ground (Withering), in such situations it will
flourish in cold clay (Marshall)", this quote from Pitt neatly
summarises the prevalence of pear in the Worcestershire countryside.
Detailing the situation in the hit year (bumper crop) of 1784, Pitt describes a situation where the pear and perry is a commonplace and locally abundant feature of the county landscape, "for want of casks, .... the liquor was spoilt: in Pershore, the juice is said to have run from the pear-hoards, in currents, into the common sewers".
Pears were widespread and abundant. Most farms, villages and many cottagers had orchards. Further confirmation of their significance can be inferred from Tithe name evidence, c.1830s. For instance, Wichenford Parish has seven references in field names to pear and a single mention of apple (and that, solely, to a special variety "Codling").
According to Pitt, pears were capable of producing twice as much liquor as apples from the same land. It was thus favoured as the common drink. Perry must have been a significant part of the calorific intake of the county's agricultural labourers. Pears have helped fuel the rural economy of the county for probably a millennium and possibly much longer.
References
A full list of references has not been included with this article due to
pressures of time and space. Various sources have been detailed in the text. For
further information please contact the author.
WBRC Home | Worcs Record Listing by Issue | Worcs Record Listing by Subject |