A 2002 PINE MARTEN RECORD FOR WORCESTERSHIRE?
Gordon Forrest, Mervyn Needham and Johnny Birks
Dead pine marten in Chaddesley Wood Photo
GordenForrest
On 15th June 2002 a dead pine marten Martes martes was found and
photographed by one of us (GF) on a footpath on the edge of
Chaddesley Woods National Nature Reserve. Apparently the corpse
had been seen at the same location the previous day by Mr. and
Mrs. Kelly, local dog-walkers. GF reported the corpse to MN, who
put it in a refuse bag on 15th June and placed it nearby for
later collection. Frustratingly, 90 minutes later the bag
containing the corpse had disappeared and could not be found
despite extensive searching and enquiries over the subsequent few
days. Thankfully GF's photographs were processed safely, and
these remain as valuable evidence to confirm that it undoubtedly
was a pine marten. Finally, on 14th July 2002, after further
searching MN found the corpse (still in its bag that had,
apparently, been thrown into thick cover by someone) a few metres
away. Having lain in the plastic bag for some 29 days in mid-summer,
putrefaction was well advanced and most of the soft tissues had
been consumed.
There are reasons for regarding this as a most unusual record
that should be treated with appropriate caution. Firstly,
although The Vincent Wildlife Trust has gathered sparse but
convincing evidence of pine martens surviving in parts of Wales
and northern England at the turn of the millenium, there has been
no such evidence from Worcestershire (or adjacent areas) since a
report of the species observed by George Wright (a gamekeeper) on
the Lickey Hills in the period 1897-1907. Even this record,
uncovered by T.J. Pickvance (1958) during his survey of West
Midland mammals, derives from a time when other authorities
regarded the pine marten as already extinct in the Midlands.
Currently, the nearest cluster of convincing records of pine
martens lies on the Welsh border, some 50-60km to the West of
Chaddesley Woods. Whilst this should not persuade us to rule out
a natural origin for the Chaddesley animal (because pine martens
are capable of dispersing huge distances), under the
circumstances we feel especially obliged to consider possible
alternative explanations. For example, could the animal be
derived from a recent escape or release from captivity? Or could
the corpse have been 'planted' for some bizarre reason? We have
made enquiries among our local contacts, and to date none has
admitted any knowledge of an escape or release that might explain
the record.
There are elements of the Chaddesley marten's appearance, visible
in GF's photographs, that raise suspicion. We showed electronic
or printed versions of the main image to several naturalists
familiar with pine martens (including three with experience of
captive martens) in order to canvas their opinions of the record.
A notable fact to emerge from this consultation was that the
animal appears to be in pelage typical of late winter rather than
mid-summer. In Britain pine martens tend to start moulting in
April, shedding their fluffy mid-brown winter coat by the end of
May so that they typically appear slim and dark in their short
summer coat by mid-June. At this time the Chaddesley animal
clearly retains most of its winter coat, and shows no sign of the
dark summer fur on its head where the spring moult starts. The
observation that the Chaddesley animal's pelage is inconsistent
with its mid-June discovery raises questions about when and where
it actually died. In the experience of those who have kept
martens in captivity, some very old animals may moult extremely
late. However, subsequent examination of the Chaddesley animal's
dentition does not suggest a great age, so this explanation for
the unusual pelage state seems unlikely.
Other observations prompted by the examination of GF's
photographs include a suggestion that the pine marten's claws (visible
best on its forefeet) appeared rather long for a wild animal (implying
that it might possibly have lived in captivity); another
suggestion, prompted by a line in the animal's fur visible in the
belly area, is that the animal may have died in a snare. However,
these observations must be regarded as speculative.
Regrettably the corpse is no longer in a state to permit some of
the analyses that might help us to draw conclusions about its
cause of death and likely origin. Nevertheless, it should be
possible to extract DNA from the specimen in order to establish
whether it has affinities with any of the genetic groupings
recently identified among pine martens from different parts of
Europe (Kyle et al., in press). This might indicate whether, for
example, the animal might have had a Scottish origin or be
derived from captive stock from another part of Europe (several
of the pine martens currently in captivity in Britain are from
Czech stock). The Vincent Wildlife Trust intends to undertake
this work at some stage in the future.
There is one piece of evidence that supports the view that the
pine marten might have lived and died locally. This concerns an
earlier live sighting in Chaddesley Woods by Mrs. Eileen Kelly
that has to be considered seriously in the light of the current
record. Mrs. Kelly reports seeing "a long dark brown animal
with a long tail and gold chest" running across a path in
summer 2000. She is convinced it was a pine marten.
The Vincent Wildlife Trust welcomes reports of wild pine martens
from England and Wales ('phone 01531 636441; email
johnnybirks@vwt.org.uk).
References
KYLE C.J., DAVISON, A. AND STROBECK, C. (in press). The genetic
structure of European pine martens (Martes martes), and
evidence for introgression with M. americana in England
. Conservation Genetics.
PICKVANCE, T.J. (1958). A note on the pine marten (Martes
martes) in Worcestershire. Zoological Society of London.
Vol. 131. p. 326-327.
WBRC Home | Worcs Record Listing by Issue | Worcs Record Listing by Subject |